"Awe_thentiX" (awe-thentix)
01/28/2014 at 17:16 • Filed to: None | 1 | 29 |
Hey, Oppo! Before I introduce myself I'd like to play a quick game. Rules are simple: guess the car model without looking back at my posts. Every 15 minutes it hasn't been guessed I'll add a hint, but I doubt it'll take very long.
midengineer
> Awe_thentiX
01/28/2014 at 17:17 | 1 |
WRX?
BugEyedBimmer - back in the Saddle Dakota Leather
> Awe_thentiX
01/28/2014 at 17:19 | 0 |
RSX?
Awe_thentiX
> midengineer
01/28/2014 at 17:19 | 0 |
Nope. I'd say you're close only because it was a bit of a competitor.
liquid1036
> Awe_thentiX
01/28/2014 at 17:19 | 0 |
STI
Awe_thentiX
> BugEyedBimmer - back in the Saddle Dakota Leather
01/28/2014 at 17:20 | 0 |
No.
Kailand09
> Awe_thentiX
01/28/2014 at 17:21 | 1 |
lancer?
Awe_thentiX
> liquid1036
01/28/2014 at 17:21 | 0 |
Nope, but the STI crowd likes to give me looks.
Awe_thentiX
> Kailand09
01/28/2014 at 17:22 | 0 |
No. Again, it was a bit of a competitor, at least with the Evo.
Takuro Spirit
> Awe_thentiX
01/28/2014 at 17:23 | 1 |
TIKI HEAD
midengineer
> Awe_thentiX
01/28/2014 at 17:24 | 1 |
Evo then? I honestly don't have a clue which gen...
Awe_thentiX
> midengineer
01/28/2014 at 17:25 | 0 |
Still incorrect. Sorry
Trunk Impaired 318
> Awe_thentiX
01/28/2014 at 17:26 | 0 |
Reminds me of a friends Neon but the color doesn't seem conducive
Awe_thentiX
> Takuro Spirit
01/28/2014 at 17:27 | 0 |
I'm struggling to see it.
carcrasher88
> Awe_thentiX
01/28/2014 at 17:28 | 0 |
I'd recognize that rear door shape anywhere! It's an SRT-4, isn't it?
midengineer
> Awe_thentiX
01/28/2014 at 17:28 | 0 |
Ah! Beautiful blue + sedan = srt4?? I see one locally every now and again.
Awe_thentiX
> Trunk Impaired 318
01/28/2014 at 17:28 | 0 |
Honestly, you're on the closest track compared to everyone else.
RacecaR
> Awe_thentiX
01/28/2014 at 17:28 | 4 |
Competitor with an Evo, but not a WRX/STI.
Competitor with a WRX/STI, but not an Evo.
And I'm sure once it is revealed it will make perfect sense. But up until then...
Awe_thentiX
> carcrasher88
01/28/2014 at 17:29 | 0 |
We have a winner!
Awe_thentiX
> midengineer
01/28/2014 at 17:30 | 0 |
There you go! Just seconds too late though
Awe_thentiX
> midengineer
01/28/2014 at 17:30 | 0 |
Doubled
Textured Soy Protein
> carcrasher88
01/28/2014 at 17:31 | 0 |
Pretty sure we have a winner here.
CAR_IS_MI
> Awe_thentiX
01/28/2014 at 17:31 | 1 |
its a lada!!!
liquid1036
> Awe_thentiX
01/28/2014 at 17:31 | 0 |
How is that a competitor to the STI and EVO.....?
Awe_thentiX
> RacecaR
01/28/2014 at 17:32 | 0 |
SRT-4. A cheaper option that managed to hold its own against the others to the surprise of many.
Awe_thentiX
> liquid1036
01/28/2014 at 17:37 | 0 |
It was more of a cheaper option that managed to keep up with the two. It may not have meant to be a true competitor, but it manages to keep up moderately well.
liquid1036
> Awe_thentiX
01/28/2014 at 17:39 | 0 |
Would have never thought of that, I could tell it was a 4 door car just was thrown off lol.
RacecaR
> Awe_thentiX
01/28/2014 at 18:00 | 1 |
Sorry but that is not a competitor to the rally bred Evos and WRX/STIs. Not saying the SRT4 is a lesser car. Just saying it is not a competitor to either of those two.
Awe_thentiX
> RacecaR
01/28/2014 at 18:09 | 1 |
If I can clarify, I know the SRT-4 was not meant to be a competitor with the STI/Evo, and it's definitely not built for the same capability (though many people do rally them, believe it or not). However, for a car that is nearly half the price, it holds its ground quite well stock for stock on the road.
I should have put in a bit more detail when I first called it a competitor. My fault, I misspoke.
Kailand09
> RacecaR
01/28/2014 at 18:38 | 0 |
I, too, was confused lol